Niharika Banerjea
Niharika Banerjea ist Associate Professor in Soziologie am Institut für freie Studien der Ambedkar-Universität in Delhi. Ihre Interessen und Bestrebungen in Forschung und Lehre drehen sich um transnationale Feminismen, queere Leben und Aktivismen, Gesellschaftstheorie und kollaborative Ethnographien.
Niharikas arbeitet disziplinenübergreifend und knüpft an Soziologie, Sozialanthropologie und Geografien von Sexualität an. Sie schreibt über vergeschlechtliche Institutionen, queer-feministische kollektive Imaginationen, Auffassungen von Gemeinschaft und gegenwärtige queere Politik in Indien.
Niharika ist außerdem mit Sappho for Equality assoziiert, einem aktivistischen Forum, das die Marginalisierung von lesbischen und bisexuellen Frauen sowie Transmännern in Ostindien behandelt. Sie identifiziert sich als Wissenschaftlerin-Aktivistin, um vertraute binäre Vorstellungen von Akademie und Aktivismus kritisch zu hinterfragen – in Lehr-/Lernräumen, in aktivistischen Räumen und in Schreibpraktiken. Über all diese Orte hinweg versucht Niharika, gemeinsam mit Mitdenker_innen, Mitschreiber_innen und Mitarbeiter_innen, „Theorie“ relevant für das Hinterfragen alltäglicher hegemonialer Beziehungen zu machen sowie selbstreferenzielle Verständnisse von „gelebten Erfahrungen“ zu hinterfragen. Zugleich setzt sie sich dafür ein, die Komplexitäten gelebter Erfahrungen zum Hinterfragen vertrauter theoretischer Unterfangen zu nützen.
Niharika identifiziert sich außerdem als queer. Diese Identifikation ist kein bereits erreichtes Moment, sondern schließt eine Ansammlung von soziopolitischen Geschichten auf verschiedenen Reisen ein.
Aktuelle Arbeiten von Niharika schließen ein: eine gemeinsam herausgegebene Anthologie zu Freund_innenschaft als Aktivismus für soziale Gerechtigkeit (University of Chicago Press, Distribution durch Seagull Books, 2018) und ein Buchmanuskript zu „Making Liveable Lives: Rethinking Social Exclusion“, an dem Niharika gemeinsam mit Professor Kath Browne (Universität Maynooth) arbeitet. Außerdem ist sie zurzeit Mitherausgeberin eines bald erscheinenden Sammelbands zu lesbischen Feminismen und arbeitet an einem Buchmanuskript zu lesbischen Räumen und Gemeinschaftsbildung in Ostindien.
Keynote - Friday, 14.09. 11:00-12:00 ZHG 011
I will discuss the question of liveability as a decolonial option, through collaborative research and activisms, both of which are central to my work and life. Queer and queer-feminist colonial subjects such as me are making their liveabilities within and through much contested binaries of modernity/tradition, civilized/uncivilized, and forward/backward. I attempt to delink from such standardized binaries through my collaborative research project around what makes life liveable for LGBTQ people across India and the UK. To this end, I argue that thinking through liveability on the terrain of queer lives brings into view everyday and often ordinary life worlds, which are otherwise hidden or normalized within juridico-political renderings of queer lives and activisms. Juridico-political frames of recognition, based on an inclusion/exclusion trope, often falls short of addressing the vulnerabilities of queer bodies residing in nations that do have rights, and forecloses an understanding of the nuanced and active agentic lives of those in nations without rights. Liveability’s decolonial potential lies in its ability to focus on the lives of those who are otherwise juridically unintelligible and folded into queerphobic and xenophobic renderings of nationalist discourses. At the same time, in places where juridical recognition is guaranteed, liveability can facilitate a discussion about the forms of living that are also constitutive of such recognition, and hence inside-outside the realms of legal rationality. Asking critical questions through the lens of liveability pushes us to re-think uninterrogated socio-political contexts within which lives either become complacent or struggle to be viable. Liveability also works as a potential connector of lives across sites of differential precarities and places of colonial difference. Consequently, with a lens of liveability, we can avoid placing nations and by implication, lives in neat narratives of progress and backwardness.
Liveability as a Decolonial Option through Collaborative Research and Activisms
Keynote - Friday, 14.09. 11:00-12:00 ZHG 011I will discuss the question of liveability as a decolonial option, through collaborative research and activisms, both of which are central to my work and life. Queer and queer-feminist colonial subjects such as me are making their liveabilities within and through much contested binaries of modernity/tradition, civilized/uncivilized, and forward/backward. I attempt to delink from such standardized binaries through my collaborative research project around what makes life liveable for LGBTQ people across India and the UK. To this end, I argue that thinking through liveability on the terrain of queer lives brings into view everyday and often ordinary life worlds, which are otherwise hidden or normalized within juridico-political renderings of queer lives and activisms. Juridico-political frames of recognition, based on an inclusion/exclusion trope, often falls short of addressing the vulnerabilities of queer bodies residing in nations that do have rights, and forecloses an understanding of the nuanced and active agentic lives of those in nations without rights. Liveability’s decolonial potential lies in its ability to focus on the lives of those who are otherwise juridically unintelligible and folded into queerphobic and xenophobic renderings of nationalist discourses. At the same time, in places where juridical recognition is guaranteed, liveability can facilitate a discussion about the forms of living that are also constitutive of such recognition, and hence inside-outside the realms of legal rationality. Asking critical questions through the lens of liveability pushes us to re-think uninterrogated socio-political contexts within which lives either become complacent or struggle to be viable. Liveability also works as a potential connector of lives across sites of differential precarities and places of colonial difference. Consequently, with a lens of liveability, we can avoid placing nations and by implication, lives in neat narratives of progress and backwardness.