Press release: Greenwashing in food labelling
No. 134 - 12.09.2024
Researchers at Göttingen University find climate traffic light system prevents consumer deception
A research team led by the University of Göttingen found that the label ‘climate neutral’ makes food appear significantly more climate-friendly than it actually is. Even when information about how the damage to the climate is being offset was explained, this did not stop consumers having the wrong perception about the product. In contrast, a traffic light labelling system – from red (meaning very harmful to the climate) to green (meaning less harmful to the climate) – helped people to better assess the climate impact of food. The results were published in the journal Food Quality and Preference.
Climate labelling is becoming increasingly significant in the marketing of food. Labels that are based on CO2 offsetting, such as the ‘climate neutral’ label, are particularly important. However, these labels about offsetting carbon emissions can be misleading and associated with greenwashing. This is because the impact on the climate is not necessarily reduced, but rather the greenhouse gases are offset in other countries. The study examined whether an explanation about this compensation mechanism could counteract possible deception to consumers. The basis for this study was a comprehensive online survey with around 2,100 consumers in Germany broadly representative of the German population. The researchers chose six products as examples: cucumber, avocado, yoghurt, vegan burger, chocolate, and parmesan cheese. Each product was labelled with five different styles of label showing the product’s impact on the climate, or with no label as a control. The researchers then evaluated how successful the participants were in interpreting the differently labelled goods to assess the climate impact of each product.
The results show that labels about compensating for carbon emissions, such as ‘climate neutral’, are misleading because they falsely lead to a more positive perception of the climate impact of food. “This effect is particularly important for foods with a high climate impact, such as meat. Such labels promote greenwashing, impede market transparency and do not provide consumers with the information to correctly identify sustainability in the foods they buy,” explains first author, Denise Dreist at Göttingen University’s Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products research group. This greenwashing effect persists even if the term ‘climate neutral’ is explained on the label. More detailed explanations and carbon footprint measurements in kg of CO2 per kg of food are also not helpful and can lead to products with a higher climate footprint being judged less critically. These misunderstandings also happened to consumers who were very interested in environmentally friendly food.
“Our results show that traffic light labels improve the public’s ability to assess climate impact. Mandatory labelling would make it easier to compare products accurately and not simply highlight climate-friendly products,” recommends the study lead, Dr Anke Zühlsdorf. “A first step could be to ban advertising that makes claims about climate neutrality.”
The study was made possible by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations as part of the “Lebensmittelklarheit” (Food Clarity) project, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture as part of the clarity and truth in the labelling and presentation of food initiative.
Original publication: Dreist, D. et al. (2024): “Greenwashing in food labelling: Consumer deception by claims of climate neutrality and the importance of an interpretative labelling approach”, Food Quality and Preference 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105294
Contact:
Denise Dreist
University of Göttingen
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences
Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products
Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
Email: Denise.dreist@uni-goettingen.de
https://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/645318.html